Related Searches: Tea Vitamin Nutrients Ingredients paper cup packing

Food & Health Ingredients
Health & Nutrition
Processing & Packaging
Starch & Starch Derivatives
You are here: Home >news >SD jury trial in BPI v ABC to start June 5, but without Diane Sawyer

SD jury trial in BPI v ABC to start June 5, but without Diane Sawyer

2017-03-16 foodsafetynews

Tag: BPI ABC jury

Share       

ABC Broadcasting and on-air reporter Jim Avila are being ordered to face a unio County, SD jury over a $5.7 billion defamation lawsuit filed by Beef Products Inc. (BPI).

ABC News Anchor Diane Sawyer, however, was released from the litigation over the Disney-owned network’s depiction of a beef product that came to be known as “pink slime.”  The trial is scheduled to get underway as early as June 5.

In dropping Sawyer as a defendant, Judge Cheryle Gering said the network anchor had little direct knowledge of ABC’s reports in March and April of 2012 that depicted BPI’s lean finely textured beef as “pink slime”

The Dakota Dune-based BPI charged ABC and its reporters with “knowingly and intentionally” airing “false and disparaging statements” about its product.

A jury trial that could last eight weeks will be heard in the First Judicial Circuit Court in Elk Point, SD. BPI’s claim of $1.9 billion in damages could be tripled under South Dakota’s Agriculture Food Products Disparagement Act. ABC’s attorneys will defend the network and its reporters as acting within the bounds for a free press.

Lean, finely textured beef is made from beef chunks and trimmings. BPI adds tiny burst of ammonium hydroxide to kill bacteria. It is then mixed with other ground beef in hamburgers.

ABC aired reports calling the product “pink slime” and saying it was not safe, nutritious or even beef, BPI was forced to close production facilities and lay-off employees after losing major restaurant and retail customers who were using the product to add to their own ground beef products.

In ruling ABC and Avila must face a jury trial, the judge said her ruling was based on there being sufficient evidence that the network and the reporter knew they were making false statements in light of the information in their possession. She said its possible a jury could find there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendants were reckless and engaged in “purposeful avoidance of the truth.”

E-newsletter

Subscribe to our e-newsletter for the latest food ingredients news and trends.

Tags

SJGLE B2B Website : 中文版 | ChineseCustomer Service: 86-400 610 1188-3 ( Mon-Fri 9: 00-18: 00 BJT)

About Us|Contact Us|Privacy Policy|Intellectual Property Statement

Copyright 2006-2023 Shanghai Sinoexpo Informa Markets International Exhibition Co Ltd (All Rights Reserved). ICP 05034851-121  沪公网安备31010402001403号

Inquiry Basket

Inquiry Basket

Buyer service

Buyer service

Supplier service

Supplier service

Top

Top